
The Charging Bull in Manhattan was by itself an illegal, unexpected art installment that quickly gained traction. But on March 7th, 2017, another statue was suddenly, but legally, placed in front of Charging Bull – a young, “fearless girl”, in anticipation of International Women’s Day. Sculpted by Kristen Visbal, it immediately provoked reactions from various media figures and the general populace. It was a hit among tourists, with tourists gathering to see it, and political pundits applauded its symbolic importance. The sculptor of Charging Bull, Arturo Di Modica, complained to city officials that it twisted the positive intent of his sculpture. Some also voiced concerns surrounding the origins of the sculpture, since it was commissioned by an investment management firm, State Street Global Advisors, to promote a new “gender-diverse” index fund.
Regardless, I thought that it was very interesting to see how an installment of a sculpture next to another one could alter its meaning. I saw this article from the DP which describes a similar scenario here at Penn: https://www.thedp.com/article/2018/12/ben-franklin-statue-art-installation-upenn-socioeconomic















